<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Surface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noelperlas.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://noelperlas.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface/</link>
	<description>Noel Perlas, noelperlas, noel perlas, perlas design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 06:14:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Noel Perlas - Perlas Design Studio &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jellio Lite Table and Tableportation</title>
		<link>http://noelperlas.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Perlas - Perlas Design Studio &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jellio Lite Table and Tableportation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noelperlas.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>[...] Those look like LEDs to me. At first when I saw it I thought, &#8220;Someone ripped-off Tableportation!&#8221; But upon reading closer, I saw Jellio lite table use gigantic color pegs that light up. So the interaction is actually different. One you pick-up and insert the other you just touch. Tableportation wins in simplicity of interaction, but I love how Jellio lite table looks.. I can image the two together. Still, if you are thinking of much more complex table tops interaction there is always Microsoft Surface. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Those look like LEDs to me. At first when I saw it I thought, &#8220;Someone ripped-off Tableportation!&#8221; But upon reading closer, I saw Jellio lite table use gigantic color pegs that light up. So the interaction is actually different. One you pick-up and insert the other you just touch. Tableportation wins in simplicity of interaction, but I love how Jellio lite table looks.. I can image the two together. Still, if you are thinking of much more complex table tops interaction there is always Microsoft Surface. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noelperlas</title>
		<link>http://noelperlas.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>noelperlas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noelperlas.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Hi Kevin.  I hope you&#039;re not from MS and that I offended you. But yes, they are different markets.  As &#039;answer&#039; I meant something like this happening in MS:

Jan 2007:
Bill to Mgt: Damn, did you see that new multi-touch iPhone that apple launched? Didn&#039;t we have some sort of the same project somewhere.
Mgt: Ya! Its called table surface.. but its still in prototype... and I think we shelved it.
Bill: I don&#039;t care, ressurect it! We should have something to show before they launch it in June.
Bill: I&#039;ll be with Steve in all things digital in May, I have to have something by then.  And call it Surface or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin.  I hope you&#8217;re not from MS and that I offended you. But yes, they are different markets.  As &#8216;answer&#8217; I meant something like this happening in MS:</p>
<p>Jan 2007:<br />
Bill to Mgt: Damn, did you see that new multi-touch iPhone that apple launched? Didn&#8217;t we have some sort of the same project somewhere.<br />
Mgt: Ya! Its called table surface.. but its still in prototype&#8230; and I think we shelved it.<br />
Bill: I don&#8217;t care, ressurect it! We should have something to show before they launch it in June.<br />
Bill: I&#8217;ll be with Steve in all things digital in May, I have to have something by then.  And call it Surface or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://noelperlas.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 12:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noelperlas.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Surface is not meant as an answer to iPhone. Totally different markets and technologies.

So why do people compare them?  I suppose because the iPhone competitors aren&#039;t for sale yet, and Apple hasn&#039;t demo&#039;d a comparable Surface unit yet.

The upshot is that both show how touch interfaces can be hyped, even if they&#039;re not the best method for everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surface is not meant as an answer to iPhone. Totally different markets and technologies.</p>
<p>So why do people compare them?  I suppose because the iPhone competitors aren&#8217;t for sale yet, and Apple hasn&#8217;t demo&#8217;d a comparable Surface unit yet.</p>
<p>The upshot is that both show how touch interfaces can be hyped, even if they&#8217;re not the best method for everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

